IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijenma/v11y2020i2p144-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context-sensitive contrastive feature-based opinion summarisation of online reviews

Author

Listed:
  • S.K. Lavanya
  • B. Parvathavarthini

Abstract

Contrastive opinion summarisation (COS) systems produce summary by selecting and aligning contrastive sentences from a set of positive and negative opinionated sentences. Most of the existing COS methods do not consider the implicit opinion present in a sentence while producing summary. Implicit opinion can be identified based on context terms present in a sentence. Therefore, a new COS approach called context-sensitive contrastive opinion summarisation is proposed. Initially linguistic rules are framed based on dependency relation to extract context-feature-opinion phrases. To automatically cluster the extracted context-feature-opinion phrases into contrastive arguments, a clustering algorithm is proposed. Context sensitive weight is calculated for each phrase based on their probability of occurrence in the concepts of ConceptNet. Clustering algorithm integrates context sensitivity with contrastive similarity for producing better arguments summary. Experimental conducted on car and product review datasets demonstrate that the context-sensitive clusters achieved good coverage and precision when compared to state-of-art approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • S.K. Lavanya & B. Parvathavarthini, 2020. "Context-sensitive contrastive feature-based opinion summarisation of online reviews," International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 144-163.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijenma:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:144-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=106309
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijenma:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:144-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=187 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.