IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijemre/v12y2021i3p285-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of hedonic value, utilitarian value and perceived risk on consumer intention of choosing P2P collaborative consumption options

Author

Listed:
  • Ngoc Trang Thi Nguyen
  • Yoonjae Lee

Abstract

Purchase decisions require consumers to consider both values and risks of products and services. To have a better understanding of peer-to-peer (P2P) collaborative consumption consumer, this research examines the motivation of consumer intention on the recurring use of P2P collaborative services on the basis of their perceived hedonic and utilitarian values as well as perceived risks. Data was collected via online surveys from mTurk of people participating in internet-mediated collaborative consumption in the US market. This research examines the consumer intention concerning P2P collaborative services by combining the effects of value and risks in a theoretical model, using structural equation modelling (SEM). The findings of this study explain the relationships between hedonic value, utilitarian value and perceived risk with collaborative consumption options choosing intention. Consumer using intention is positively influenced by both hedonic and utilitarian values as well as negatively by perceived risk, in which utilitarian value makes a stronger effect on intention than hedonic value, this study analysis also provides evidence that monetary savings does not impact perceived value of consumer for collaborative consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngoc Trang Thi Nguyen & Yoonjae Lee, 2021. "The effect of hedonic value, utilitarian value and perceived risk on consumer intention of choosing P2P collaborative consumption options," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 285-305.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:285-305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=116504
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijemre:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:285-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=43 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.