IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijemec/v6y2018i2-3p111-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An odds-ratio approach for handling proportional and bounded values in data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Aysun Ceyhan
  • James Benneyan

Abstract

The usual assumption in data envelopment analysis (DEA) that all input and output values are unconstrained positive values is not always satisfied, such as when analysing proportions, rates, and percentages bound between 0 and 1 (e.g., defect, graduation, satisfaction, or mortality rates). In such cases, solving standard constant returns-to-scale (CRS) DEA models can produce output target values that exceed their upper bounds (e.g., 130% survival or 210% market penetration). Data constrained on other intervals (e.g., patient satisfaction scores between 1 and 5) present a related problem, where a computed target theoretically can exceed its upper bound. We introduce an odds-ratio transformation for such cases that always produces targets within their given bounds and explore its impact on analysis results (efficiency scores, targets, weights), offering the modeller an alternative for evaluating relative efficiency and setting management goals when variable returns-to-scale (VRS) relationships are not appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Aysun Ceyhan & James Benneyan, 2018. "An odds-ratio approach for handling proportional and bounded values in data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Engineering Management and Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2/3), pages 111-137.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijemec:v:6:y:2018:i:2/3:p:111-137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95674
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijemec:v:6:y:2018:i:2/3:p:111-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=299 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.