IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijelfi/v7y2013i1p15-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial reporting comparability: toward an XBRL ontology of the FASB/IFRS conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell R. Wenger
  • Manoj A. Thomas
  • Jeffry Stephen Babb

Abstract

As a mechanism for the exchange, transmission, and reporting of accounting and financial data, eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) makes great strides toward standardisation. However, given the global nature of contemporary financial markets, XBRL reporting must transcend or accommodate differences in reporting standards. Presently, the two standards for XBRL reporting, the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), make reconciling meanings between these standards a laborious and error-prone affair. As the audience for this reporting often spans countries and cultures, many have a stake in digesting XBRL-formatted financial reports. This paper addresses the question of how cross-cultural and transnational consumers of XBRL statements can derive meaning from these reports. We present an ontological approach toward solving this problem which includes a financial reporting ontology and associated architecture for comparing concepts across XBRL taxonomies. The architecture is explained, evaluation criteria offered, and future research approaches toward realising artefacts using this architecture are proffered.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell R. Wenger & Manoj A. Thomas & Jeffry Stephen Babb, 2013. "Financial reporting comparability: toward an XBRL ontology of the FASB/IFRS conceptual framework," International Journal of Electronic Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 15-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:15-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijelfi:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:15-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=171 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.