IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeima/v9y2009i3p204-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why aren't we learning from our partners? An investigation on the relationship between initial conditions and knowledge acquisition effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Hung-bin Ding
  • Phillip H. Phan

Abstract

Although the theoretical literature has been favourable regarding the benefits of alliances, the empirical literature has been less clear. In part, we argue that this is because the literature generally ignores the initial organisational conditions of the firms before engaging in such activities. To address this issue, we designed a survey research to study the impact of initial product innovation conditions on the inter-firm networking patterns of entrepreneurial firms. We tested our hypotheses on small and medium biotechnology and IC design firms in the USA and Taiwan. The results suggest that inter-firm alliances serve as an effective platform of external knowledge acquisition when the knowledge recipients are strongly committed to the knowledge acquisition process. However, the efforts to acquire external knowledge are usually diluted as the size of the focal firm's inter-firm network increases. Such dilution effect reduces the effectiveness of external knowledge acquisition from external partners.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung-bin Ding & Phillip H. Phan, 2009. "Why aren't we learning from our partners? An investigation on the relationship between initial conditions and knowledge acquisition effectiveness," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 204-228.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:9:y:2009:i:3:p:204-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=25140
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:9:y:2009:i:3:p:204-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.