IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v6y2015i2p150-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The problematic of imputing joint costs in management accounting for organisations: reviewing state of the art practices

Author

Listed:
  • Donatien Avelé

Abstract

The objective of this article is to refocus the debate on the problematic of identifying the distribution of joint costs resulting from co-products produced by organisations. Starting with a summary of the theoretical analytical tools that exist on the subject, we have attempted to reengage the preoccupation of organisational managers regarding the allocation of joint costs. Reviewing the state of art has allowed us to distinguish two allocation logics for the joint cost of co-products. The first logic is based on market data while the second is more oriented towards physical data or material measurements. Considering the stated objective of joint cost allocation in manufacturing, using numerical examples, we have examined different methods of joint cost allocation, all the while showing the particularities of each type. However, the complexity and the subjectivity of joint cost allocation for co-products leaves us to believe that, while it is important to choose a particular method by taking into account the stated objectives, one must still remain sufficiently cautious before sanctioning any decision making necessary for performance evaluation in situations that infer the joint cost allocation for manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Donatien Avelé, 2015. "The problematic of imputing joint costs in management accounting for organisations: reviewing state of the art practices," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 150-167.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:150-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=69908
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:150-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.