IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijdsrm/v3y2011i3-4p347-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating electronic port services for container terminals: the PPA case

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolaos S. Marianos
  • Maria A. Lambrou
  • Dimitris Spyrou

Abstract

The global crisis has made it more important than ever for container terminals to find ways to attract customers. In order to achieve this, a container terminal must apply a cost leadership strategy or differentiate its functions. The introduction of electronic port services offers greater productivity, reduced operational cost, and higher level of quality services. As the need to support agile container terminal operations with rapidly evolving and highly differentiated software applications emerges, robust, integrated and usable methodologies and tools, specialised in evaluating electronic services for container terminal operations are necessary. We propose a particular approach that combines the strategic fit, AHP, QFD and balanced scorecard techniques in order to evaluate the e-services to be adopted in a container terminal environment, using a variety of criteria covering technological, organisational and environmental dimensions. The paper presents the case study of the container terminal of Piraeus Port Authority (PPA) where the methodology has been applied to evaluate a number of selected electronic port services.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolaos S. Marianos & Maria A. Lambrou & Dimitris Spyrou, 2011. "Evaluating electronic port services for container terminals: the PPA case," International Journal of Decision Sciences, Risk and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 347-368.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsrm:v:3:y:2011:i:3/4:p:347-368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsrm:v:3:y:2011:i:3/4:p:347-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=254 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.