IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v4y2012i5-6p572-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adopting IPSAS to improve governmental accountability in Spain: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Navarro Galera
  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar

Abstract

In Spain, a new General Public Accounting Plan has been approved adapting Spanish accounting criteria to the IPSAS issued by the IFAC, which could strengthen the quality of governmental financial information and favour accountability via enhanced financial transparency, the benchmarking analysis and the efficiency of public services. A major issue when endorsing IPSAS is the measurement bases used in accounting. Regardless of problems of reliability, the fair value (FV) accounting proposed by the IPSAS aims to favour the understanding, efficiency assessments, timeliness of financial reports and to improve benchmarking analysis. This paper examines whether FV would improve the accountability of public administrations in Spain and thus favour the transparency of financial statements. Based on an empirical research on the Spanish central supreme audit institution (SAI) and on 11 regional SAIs, findings indicate that the adoption of FV could favour transparency and accountability in Spain, although it would depend on several factors such as the information included in the notes, the staff training in valuation methods, the hiring of external appraisers and the existence of generally accepted methods of estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Navarro Galera & Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, 2012. "Adopting IPSAS to improve governmental accountability in Spain: an empirical study," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5/6), pages 572-607.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:4:y:2012:i:5/6:p:572-607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51465
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:4:y:2012:i:5/6:p:572-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.