IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v6y2010i3p277-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A structured approach to identifying European critical infrastructures

Author

Listed:
  • C. Di Mauro
  • S. Bouchon
  • C. Logtmeijer
  • R.D. Pride
  • T. Hartung
  • J.P. Nordvik

Abstract

Our increasingly complex and interconnected societies are continuously exposed to a wide range of risks. Infrastructure systems are subject to functional impairments associated with technological failure, natural threats and malicious acts. The adequate functioning of infrastructures is crucially sustaining our societal and economic activities. Therefore, the protection of infrastructures becomes more and more an important issue for policy makers. This paper reports the experience gained during the preparatory studies carried out by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) to support the European Commission and its member states on the definition of criteria for identifying critical infrastructures. The existing methods for identifying critical infrastructures are mainly based on risk analysis techniques. These approaches were found to be insufficient and need to be complemented with socioeconomic evaluations of potential impacts. This paper highlights the contribution of stakeholders and decision makers in the process of definition and identification of critical infrastructures because the concept of criticality is deeply rooted in sociopolitical acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Di Mauro & S. Bouchon & C. Logtmeijer & R.D. Pride & T. Hartung & J.P. Nordvik, 2010. "A structured approach to identifying European critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 277-292.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:6:y:2010:i:3:p:277-292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=33340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip M. Kruse & Hanna C. Schmitt & Stefan Greiving, 2021. "Systemic criticality—a new assessment concept improving the evidence basis for CI protection," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Olaf Jonkeren & Ivano Azzini & Luca Galbusera & Stavros Ntalampiras & Georgios Giannopoulos, 2015. "Analysis of Critical Infrastructure Network Failure in the European Union: A Combined Systems Engineering and Economic Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 253-270, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:6:y:2010:i:3:p:277-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.