IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v1y2005i4p299-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operator support for ageing nuclear critical infrastructure systems: integrating ecological interface design with prospect theory

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Burns
  • Ali Asgary
  • Jason K. Levy

Abstract

Operator support is essential for making decisions involving ageing infrastructure. In particular, ageing plants may have deviated from their original condition into a new state with a less predictable set of possible actions and outcomes. Standard procedures and practices may be insufficient to handle the risks and vulnerabilities of ageing nuclear infrastructure. Operator support must be designed with an understanding of how operators make decisions under uncertainty and a view to supporting unexpected situations. Prospect theory (PT) and ecological interface design (EID) are proposed as two complementary approaches for guiding operator support. PT describes how people make decisions under uncertainty and EID is an interface design approach for aiding operators with the problem-solving process in unanticipated situations. We suggest that these two approaches can be integrated to improve complex decision making in ageing nuclear plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Burns & Ali Asgary & Jason K. Levy, 2005. "Operator support for ageing nuclear critical infrastructure systems: integrating ecological interface design with prospect theory," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 299-311.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:1:y:2005:i:4:p:299-311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6676
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:1:y:2005:i:4:p:299-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.