IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcgov/v7y2016i2p138-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Busy audit committee members and internal control deficiencies

Author

Listed:
  • Shaowen Hua
  • Bruce A. Leauby
  • Zenghui Liu

Abstract

This paper investigates whether audit committees being busy affect their ability to monitor a company's internal control system. We define a busy audit committee as a ratio of busy audit committee members to all audit committee members. A director is 'busy' if he/she holds at least three board directorships. We find a significant negative association between firms reporting internal control deficiencies, as required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and busy audit committees. Prior literature is inconclusive about the constructive contributions of busy directors to corporate governance. We interpret these results to indicate busy directors can overcome time constraints by using their industry expertise and networking connections to contribute to the effectiveness of internal control. This study is the first documenting the positive impact of busy directors on internal control providing additional evidence that constructive corporate practices can be transmitted through interlocked directors. In addition, we find tenure of 8 years or more for audit committee members is significantly associated with effective internal controls suggesting higher diligence is exercised by these longer-tenured board members.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaowen Hua & Bruce A. Leauby & Zenghui Liu, 2016. "Busy audit committee members and internal control deficiencies," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 138-163.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:138-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:138-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=260 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.