IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcgov/v3y2012i1p19-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor-client compatibility and corporate governance effectiveness: an empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed M. Abdel-Meguid

Abstract

This paper examines a new facet of the auditor-client relationship, the extent to which the auditor's portfolio of audited clients' industries matches its client's portfolio of business segments which I refer to as the auditor-client compatibility. The paper examines how compatibility affects audit quality and consequently the auditor's governance effectiveness. Using a sample of clients of big auditing firms, I empirically examine the effect of compatibility on earnings quality proxied by absolute discretionary accruals as a manifestation of audit quality and in turn corporate governance effectiveness. I document a negative relation between compatibility and discretionary accruals suggesting that compatibility contributes to effective governance. This result holds for several robustness checks. The study introduces a new measure of industry specialisation: compatibility. It also highlights how the multi-segment nature of companies has auditing and governance implications, a dimension that has been relatively ignored in the auditing and corporate governance literatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed M. Abdel-Meguid, 2012. "Auditor-client compatibility and corporate governance effectiveness: an empirical analysis," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 19-45.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:3:y:2012:i:1:p:19-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45280
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:3:y:2012:i:1:p:19-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=260 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.