IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcgov/v2y2011i3-4p201-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent trends in corporate governance practices in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • D.K. Malhotra
  • Mary Sheila McDonald

Abstract

Seven years have passed since the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley or the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002. Since then, there has been much debate over the costs and benefits of the most far reaching reforms of US business practices since the time of FDR. Glaring abuses in corporate governance continue to capture the headlines as details revealing sky-high executive compensation as well as reports of conflicts of interests and a variety of breaches of fiduciary duties. But have corporate governance standards improved? In this paper, we postulate that corporate governance has four pillars – board of directors, audit committees, poison pills, and executive and director compensation and ownership. Using the data from 2003 to 2008, we examine recent trends in various aspects of corporate governance that includes board issues, audit committees, poison pills, and executive compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • D.K. Malhotra & Mary Sheila McDonald, 2011. "Recent trends in corporate governance practices in the USA," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3/4), pages 201-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:2:y:2011:i:3/4:p:201-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44375
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:2:y:2011:i:3/4:p:201-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=260 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.