IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcgov/v1y2009i3p315-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bidders' board structure and acquisition returns

Author

Listed:
  • Ray Donnelly

Abstract

The extant academic evidence is, at best, mixed regarding whether bidders gain from their acquisitions. It suggests that many, arguably most, acquirers fail to add to shareholder value through their bids. This paper proposes and explains why companies with boards of directors, which are relatively independent of management, should make better acquisition bids. This prediction is tested using financial event study methodology. Evidence that Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR) on acquisition is significantly positive for companies with independent boards is reported. Furthermore, these companies have significantly higher abnormal returns (ARs) than those with non-independent boards.

Suggested Citation

  • Ray Donnelly, 2009. "Bidders' board structure and acquisition returns," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 315-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:315-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=29373
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:315-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=260 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.