IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v17y2023i6p622-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Publication patterns of business analytics faculty: toward a well-founded assessment of productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Qin
  • Kai S. Koong
  • Zhaojun Yang

Abstract

In many business disciplines, impact metrics and measurements of productivity are well established, including institutionally-approved journal lists available for the use of both faculty and administration. Faculty in business analytics related fields generally have no such tool available, leading at times to confusion, undervaluing of their scholarship, and even litigation. In this study, we take the preliminary steps for establishing objective assessment tools for business analytics faculty by studying the publication patterns of the most productive current practitioners. An initial list of 700 publishing outlets was narrowed down to approximately 100 that account for 30% of all published scholarship in the field. We suggest this list can be used as an initial benchmark for future institution-based conversations about faculty review.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Qin & Kai S. Koong & Zhaojun Yang, 2023. "Publication patterns of business analytics faculty: toward a well-founded assessment of productivity," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(6), pages 622-635.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:17:y:2023:i:6:p:622-635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134479
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:17:y:2023:i:6:p:622-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.