IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v13y2019i3p297-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing university rank and tenure decisions using a multi-criteria decision-making approach

Author

Listed:
  • Enrique Mu
  • Cynthia Busin Nicola

Abstract

Faculty evaluation in academia is a serious concern for higher-education administrators. This study develops a model for rank and tenure (R%T) decisions using an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Literature review suggests most R%T evaluations are rather subjective in many institutions. A case method approach is used for the development of a model and demonstration of its use. The proposed evaluation model provides objectivity, transparency and customisation for R%T committee decisions in higher-education institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrique Mu & Cynthia Busin Nicola, 2019. "Managing university rank and tenure decisions using a multi-criteria decision-making approach," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 297-320.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:13:y:2019:i:3:p:297-320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=100374
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:13:y:2019:i:3:p:297-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.