IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbsre/v12y2018i2p162-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring efficiency in US teaching hospitals associated with quality variables

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong Hoon Choi
  • Dong-Hyun Oh

Abstract

This research compares the efficiency of US teaching and non-teaching hospitals as estimated by using data envelopment analysis. Labour costs, capital costs and other operating expenses are employed as input variables. The research models are divided into two main cases based on different sets of outputs. In both cases, teaching hospitals show higher efficiency scores than non-teaching hospitals. For-profit hospitals show higher efficiency scores than not-for-profit or governmental hospitals. With regard to the size, larger hospitals are associated with higher efficiency scores. Regional variations are detected, but they seem to fade in comparing some regions. This paper addresses the economically important question of what explains heterogeneity in production functions across hospitals by measuring the efficiency of hospitals, including quality variables. The inclusion of quality metrics in efficiency estimates represents an improvement over similar existing studies, since patient outcomes are key to considering welfare implications in the healthcare sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong Hoon Choi & Dong-Hyun Oh, 2018. "Measuring efficiency in US teaching hospitals associated with quality variables," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 162-180.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:162-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90695
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:162-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=206 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.