IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpsc/v12y2021i1p69-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturing vs. remanufacturing: study and analysis of a green supply chain in Japan and Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Massimiliano Caramia
  • Yasutaka Kainuma
  • Carola Altobelli

Abstract

In this study, we analyse the side effects of the remanufacturing process, which are the cannibalisation effect, negative, and the market expansion, positive, when both new and remanufactured goods are sold in the market. This research is conducted analysing a manufacturing Japanese firm which produces printers and whose production process is a hybrid system of manufacturing and remanufacturing. In the first part of our study, we give a quantitative evaluation of both cannibalisation effect and market expansion, in order to estimate which one impacts more on the performance of the firm. Next, through the implementation of a mathematical formulation of the problem by means of a commercial solver, we were able to determine the price of remanufactured items which guarantees the maximum profit to the company, with the aim to compare the latter to the profit gained when only new items are sold. By the experiments conducted, it emerges that the remanufacturing process is more profitable than the model with only new goods sold. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate such kind of practices in supply chain management policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimiliano Caramia & Yasutaka Kainuma & Carola Altobelli, 2021. "Manufacturing vs. remanufacturing: study and analysis of a green supply chain in Japan and Europe," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 69-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpsc:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:69-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=114749
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpsc:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:69-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=341 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.