IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v12y2010i1p72-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial performance and voluntary environmental disclosures during the Asian Financial Crisis: the case of Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Marinilka B. Kimbro
  • Sara R. Melendy

Abstract

Voluntary environmental reporting and disclosures (VED) in annual reports provide managers with an effective way to manage expectations of the sustainability and risk exposure of the firm. Many studies have documented that VED are fairly common among publicly listed firms. However, in the case of Hong Kong (HK) during the Asian Financial Crisis, VED use was very low. This study contributes to the research on VED by examining the association of VED levels and firm performance in a unique environment, one where VED are more likely to be truthful. The theoretical argument tested is that in low-information and economically volatile environments, the relatively few firms that include VED in their annual reports are truthfully indicating their superior financial performance. After controlling for capital and debt structure, the statistically significant results show that firms with VED are more profitable than firms that did not disclose during the same period. This suggests that, firms that are in difficult economic environments, such as emerging capital markets or severe economic crises, are less likely to use VED and thus the VED are more likely to be truthful.

Suggested Citation

  • Marinilka B. Kimbro & Sara R. Melendy, 2010. "Financial performance and voluntary environmental disclosures during the Asian Financial Crisis: the case of Hong Kong," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 72-85.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:12:y:2010:i:1:p:72-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=36042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:12:y:2010:i:1:p:72-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.