IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v8y2011i4p339-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical analysis for comparison of the key representation database with the original database

Author

Listed:
  • Asim Abdallah Elshiekh
  • P.D.D. Dominic

Abstract

Statistical databases (SDBs) are used mainly for statistics, and individuals' information should remain secret. Key representation auditing scheme (KRAS) is proposed to guard individuals' confidentiality in online and dynamic SDBs. KRAS converts the original database into key representation database (KRDB) and each new query should be converted into key representation query. Three audit stages are proposed to guarantee the security of SDBs. Also, cost estimation for this scheme is performed, and we illustrate the savings in CPU time and storage space using KRDB. In this paper, we provide statistical analysis for comparison of original database with KRDB to compare between the means/variances of the original database and the KRDB populations. Comparisons are provided in terms of linear search, binary search and sorting. The results of the tests showed that the differences are statistically significant, except in one case, namely the differences between the variances in terms of binary search.

Suggested Citation

  • Asim Abdallah Elshiekh & P.D.D. Dominic, 2011. "Statistical analysis for comparison of the key representation database with the original database," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 339-360.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:339-360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=42395
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:339-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.