IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v6y2011i2p154-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The paradox of trust: why 'profit' does not have to be a bad word in the concept of corporate social responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Kaushik Sridhar

Abstract

This paper discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and various theories and ideas around CSR. The theoretical framework of the paper is based on ethics, morality, and conceptual research of CSR. The focus of the paper is to clarify the concepts which managers have concerning CSR and its link towards becoming more sustainable. When companies 'behaviours are based on ethical issues, they create positive reputation among stakeholders. The concerns that businesses have had for society can be traced back centuries, although the actual literature on social responsibility is mostly prevalent in the last five decades or so. This paper discusses CSR and various theories and ideas around CSR. Hence, the review of CSR's definitional evolution will focus on this body of literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaushik Sridhar, 2011. "The paradox of trust: why 'profit' does not have to be a bad word in the concept of corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 154-168.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:6:y:2011:i:2:p:154-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38487
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:6:y:2011:i:2:p:154-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.