IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v36y2024i1p83-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of stock returns through P/E, PEG and PERG: evidence from Nifty-100

Author

Listed:
  • Dinesh Kumar Sharma
  • Rakesh Kumar Srivastava
  • Prashant Gupta

Abstract

In this study, the concept of value investing strategies is employed for stock screening, whereby low-PE, low-PEG, and low-PERG ratios have been used. The concepts are based on the hypotheses that the stocks screened out with the help of these ratios could generate better returns than the market returns. This study has also examined that which risk alternative, the standard deviation of returns (σ) or the beta coefficient (β), could improve the performance while adjusting with PEG. On the bases of these alternative strategies, 30 stocks have been selected out of Nifty-100 stocks to construct different portfolios and held through the investment period from 2008 to 2018. Portfolios constructed by using low-PE ratio, low-PEG ratio and low-PERG ratio as screening strategies resulted in higher returns than the market average during investment period. Holding-period returns (HPRs) for low-PERG-β strategy have outperformed the market returns as well as other alternative strategies during April 2008 to March 2018 investment period. Beta (β) appeared to be a better alternative for risk factor than the standard deviation of returns when adjusted risk factor with PEG ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinesh Kumar Sharma & Rakesh Kumar Srivastava & Prashant Gupta, 2024. "Study of stock returns through P/E, PEG and PERG: evidence from Nifty-100," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(1), pages 83-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:83-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135996
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:83-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.