IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v31y2022i2p216-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative analysis of experiences of work-life integration of dual career couples

Author

Listed:
  • Sakshi Vashisht
  • Nidhi Punj
  • Ravi Vashisht

Abstract

The intent of the present study was to describe the work-life balance experiences of dual career couples. The study aimed to capture the dimensions of the experiences of dual career couples in managing the demands at work and home when both the partners work together at the same workplace. Respondents of the study were faculty members who were in employment and working in the same organisation. Participants were selected using snowball sampling technique. A total of 15 couples participated in the present qualitative study. The couples were interviewed together. Age of the participants ranged from 25 to 45. 40% of the respondents had dependent children, 33% had children who were adults and 27% had no children. Hours worked per week ranged from 40 to 47 hours. Data collection for the study consisted of self-reported data, which included in-depth interviews. The data was analysed using a thematic qualitative analysis technique. Reduced social integration, societal viewpoints, monotonous schedules, job insecurity, organisational support and spouse support were the major themes that emerged from the analysis of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakshi Vashisht & Nidhi Punj & Ravi Vashisht, 2022. "A qualitative analysis of experiences of work-life integration of dual career couples," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(2), pages 216-228.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:216-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125953
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:216-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.