IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v19y2017i1p52-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice of diversification strategies in an emerging market environment: an empirical evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Aparna Bhatia
  • Anu Thakur

Abstract

The paper compares the nature, extent and pattern of diversification of domestic companies with companies having multinational operations. A sample of 536 companies has been studied over three points of time, i.e. 2001, 2006 and 2011. Jacquemin-Berry entropy-index (1979) has been applied to measure diversification. Results suggest that domestic companies have larger extent of diversification as compared to companies with multi-national operations. Domestic as well as multi-national companies seem to prefer 'related diversification' to extreme choices of diversification. The pattern of diversification follows both forward and backward movement while companies with purely domestic operations have shown a greater trend towards forward pattern.

Suggested Citation

  • Aparna Bhatia & Anu Thakur, 2017. "Choice of diversification strategies in an emerging market environment: an empirical evaluation," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 52-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:19:y:2017:i:1:p:52-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Narendar V., Rao & K.S., Reddy, 2017. "Guest Editorial: Institutional role, the Market for corporate control and Firm performance," MPRA Paper 80235, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:19:y:2017:i:1:p:52-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.