IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v10y2013i1p72-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for inflation convergence: a panel unit-root approach

Author

Listed:
  • Siok Kun Sek

Abstract

We conduct empirical analyses to study the inflation performance in three groups of economies, namely the European Monetary Union (EMU), the developed and the developing inflation targeting (IT) economies. In particular, our first objective is to compare the performance of inflation targeting regime versus monetary union of EMU in achieving lower inflation rate. The second objective is to detect convergence of inflation (inflation differential) of these economies over different time frames by applying the panel unit-root tests. Apart from this, we also compare their speed of convergence over different time frames. The results show that developed and developing IT economies experience larger improvement in terms of lower inflation rate on average in compare to the EMU economies. The large reduction in inflation rate can be explained by the high initial inflation rates of these economies. No significant evidence shows that inflation targeting economies perform better than EMU (monetary union) in achieving lower inflation rate. Besides, we also detect inflation convergence in all groups of economies over in 1990s and 2000s but not in 1980s. Inflation targeting economies experience higher speed of convergence relative to EMU.

Suggested Citation

  • Siok Kun Sek, 2013. "Testing for inflation convergence: a panel unit-root approach," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 72-85.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:72-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51804
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:72-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.