IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v18y2024i2p136-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too far apart! - An evaluation of the challenges impeding virtual teams' success

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Aghimien
  • Lerato Aghimien
  • Clinton Aigbavboa
  • Siphiwe Dhladhla

Abstract

In today's business world, technological advancement, globalisation and the recent global pandemic have contributed to the increased use of virtual teams (VTs). However, the use of VTs in the construction industry in South Africa and the challenges facing this type of team are yet to be explored. Therefore, this study assessed the challenges facing VTs in the South African construction industry using a questionnaire as the data collection instrument. The data were analysed using percentage, mean item score, Kruskal-Wallis H-test, and fuzzy synthetic evaluation. The study found five groups of challenges impeding the success of VTs. Based on the findings, the study concludes that top management and owners of construction organisations seeking to improve their project success through VTs must put measures in place to address issues relating to: 1) trust and cohesion; 2) diversity; 3) leadership; 4) communications; 5) task specifications. Practically, should the identified challenges be considered, construction organisations would be able to use their VTs to deliver construction projects effectively. Theoretically, the study contributes to the existing discourse on VTs by showing these challenges from the South African construction industry perspective, where such a study does not exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Aghimien & Lerato Aghimien & Clinton Aigbavboa & Siphiwe Dhladhla, 2024. "Too far apart! - An evaluation of the challenges impeding virtual teams' success," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2), pages 136-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:18:y:2024:i:2:p:136-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:18:y:2024:i:2:p:136-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.