IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v16y2022i2p241-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The death of a company: an ethical assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Dias De Oliveira
  • Conceição Soares
  • Gonçalo Marcelo

Abstract

The process that leads to the closing down of a company requires a deliberative action and a strong sense of governance from managers. Research on the process of organisational death is scarce, and it is often thought that managers may wish to postpone the death and eventual demise of their company. We argue that such behaviour is a dismissal of managers' responsibilities. Drawing on the case of 'Glue', we discuss whether the decision to close down a company can be ethically justified. We adopted a procedural, context-bound and existential framework and the results unveil some of the specific traits of what is involved in the decision to let a company die. Explaining managers' behaviour in terms of authentic existence enables us to understand how managers cope with the death of a company. Furthermore, we suggest that sometimes closing down is the most responsible option that conciliates the interest of different constituents.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Dias De Oliveira & Conceição Soares & Gonçalo Marcelo, 2022. "The death of a company: an ethical assessment," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 241-262.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:241-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121855
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:241-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.