IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v28y2022i1p32-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does organisational support moderate the relationships between work-family/family-work conflict and well-being of private university academicians?

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Mizanur Rahman
  • Md. Saidur Rahaman
  • Mohammad Jamal Uddin
  • Adedeji Babatunji Samuel
  • Iqbal Hossain Moral

Abstract

This research paper aims to test the moderation effects of organisational support (OS) in the relationship between both directions of work-family conflict (work to family conflict and family to work conflict) and well-being. In order to achieve this fundamental objective, in this paper, the convenience sampling technique has been adopted. A sample of 280 academicians who work in private universities in Bangladesh are taken as the respondents structural equation modelling (SEM) technique using AMOS, multi-group analysis method has been adopted to test for the moderation effects. The findings revealed that OS does not moderate the relationships between both directions of work-family conflict (W-FC) and well-being (WB). However, the findings of this research were discussed in relation to the conservation of resource (COR) theory. This study has added further value to the aspects of organisational behaviour and human resource management with the incorporation of the situations that influence the relationship between work to family conflict (W to FC), family to work conflict (F to WC) and well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Mizanur Rahman & Md. Saidur Rahaman & Mohammad Jamal Uddin & Adedeji Babatunji Samuel & Iqbal Hossain Moral, 2022. "Does organisational support moderate the relationships between work-family/family-work conflict and well-being of private university academicians?," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(1), pages 32-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:32-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125718
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:32-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.