IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbenv/v8y2016i1p43-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal free trial strategy of software in the digital environment

Author

Listed:
  • Shuojia Guo
  • S. Chan Choi

Abstract

The software industry has gone through a radical transformation in the past decade in the way products are distributed to consumers. The new digital distribution environment has made it easier and cost efficient to offer free trials of digital products, which in turn provided an excellent environment to build the user base quickly. This paper considers a software firm's decision to offer a free version with limited functionality in a competitive software market. We provide a duopoly model of software firms in which a dominant firm determines the relative quality of the free version in order to maximise its profit under network externality. When network externality is sufficiently large, it is optimal for the high-quality dominant firm to offer a limited functionality (i.e., lower quality) free version. The freeware's optimal quality level should be high enough to entice lower-end customers to adopt it, but it also needs to be low enough to benefit from the expanded network by the lower-quality competitor in the market. The high-quality firm's optimal profit and freeware's quality increase as the network externality increases. In addition, when usage cost is sufficiently small, it is the high-quality firm's best interest to keep the quality of its free version below that of the low-quality competitor so that the freeware does not drive the low-quality firm out of the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuojia Guo & S. Chan Choi, 2016. "Optimal free trial strategy of software in the digital environment," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 43-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbenv:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:43-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=74794
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbenv:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:43-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=69 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.