IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbema/v9y2017i2p93-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour productivity in the Palestinian family industries

Author

Listed:
  • Nidal Rashid Sabri
  • Raniya Yaser Jaber
  • Wafaa Yosef AL-Bitawi
  • Jawana Awwad

Abstract

The family businesses represent the majority of the private sector in the Palestinian economy. It is known that the labour productivity is supposed to be higher in family businesses compared to non-family businesses due to direct supervision and other aspects. Therefore, the general purpose of this research is to discuss this issue in general and to compare labour productivity in the Palestinian family industries with non-family industries. The study used various indicators to measure labour productivity such as, sales value per employee, cost of labour to sales ratio, and cost of goods sold value per employee. The aim is to indicate whether the merits of family business are reflected in producing higher labour productivity as expressed by different outputs. The study found that the cost of labour in family business industries is less than in non-family industries, but the productivity is much higher in the non-family industries compared to family industries as expressed by the sales value per employee. In addition the difference between labour productivity of public corporations (non-family) and family industries is existed but is not decisive; and mainly it is in favour to non-family industries, while there are no significant differences among the family business groups whether it is food or non-food industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nidal Rashid Sabri & Raniya Yaser Jaber & Wafaa Yosef AL-Bitawi & Jawana Awwad, 2017. "Labour productivity in the Palestinian family industries," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 93-103.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbema:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:93-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83346
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbema:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:93-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=249 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.