IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbema/v13y2021i1p74-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policies versus politics: which is the more important determinant of public sector supplier selection decisions in Nigeria?

Author

Listed:
  • Eyo Emmanuel Essien
  • Glory Sunday Etim

Abstract

Government policy requirements and external political influence are two important factors that have been associated with public procurement processes, but only few studies have considered their relative effect on public supplier selection outcomes in emerging markets. Using Nigerian public sector firms as research setting, this study aimed to empirically determine which of these two factors is more important/influential in explaining supplier selection decisions. Data were obtained from a purposeful sample of 342 senior level staff drawn from 40 public sector firms via structured self-administered questionnaires. Result of regression analysis shows that relative to the importance attached to government policies during public supplier selection decisions, considerations for the interests of important politicians predominate the process. In other words, though important, government policy measures aimed at constraining public sector supplier selection behaviour will continue to appear ineffective in the face of inordinate political influence in the selection process. The implications of the study's finding to prospective investors and policy makers, as well as suggestions for further research, are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyo Emmanuel Essien & Glory Sunday Etim, 2021. "Policies versus politics: which is the more important determinant of public sector supplier selection decisions in Nigeria?," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 74-88.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbema:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:74-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=112774
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbema:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:74-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=249 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.