IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbeaf/v2y2011i1p40-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of cognitive biases on fraudulent behaviour: the Leeson case

Author

Listed:
  • Asokan Anandarajan
  • Gary Kleinman

Abstract

The forensic accounting literature (e.g., Albrecht et al., 2010) places a great deal of importance on the so-called fraud triangle of motive-means-opportunity. Wolfe and Hermanson (2004) presents a cognitive analysis of factors that may impact the motivation element in the fraud triangle, arguing that situational and other factors may lead individuals to engage in illegal acts without conscious intent to violate the law. We argue that cognitive analyses are important also in understanding individual evaluations of the means and opportunities that confront them. We draw on relevant psychological literature to show how cognitive heuristics can be used to explain why certain managers, in the presence of incentives, rationalise and commit fraud in accounting. We use the 'fraud diamond' (Wolfe and Hermanson, 2004) as the basis of our theoretical development. We use the Leeson/Barings bank's case as an example to demonstrate the application of cognitive biases in the perpetration of fraud.

Suggested Citation

  • Asokan Anandarajan & Gary Kleinman, 2011. "The impact of cognitive biases on fraudulent behaviour: the Leeson case," International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 40-55.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:40-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38756
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kleinman, Gary & Anandarajan, Asokan, 2011. "Inattentional blindness and its relevance to teaching forensic accounting and auditing," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 37-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:40-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=237 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.