IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v9y2019i3p226-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-informed decision-making with an improved risk-based approach to evaluate plug and abandonment designs

Author

Listed:
  • Henrik Langdalen
  • Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen
  • Jon Tømmerås Selvik
  • Hans Petter Lohne

Abstract

A risk-based approach has been established to evaluate the quality of plug and abandonment oil and gas well designs that differ from the regulatory requirements on the Norwegian continental shelf. A move away from the prescriptive requirements to a more performance-based approach implies a reliance on the risk-based approach's ability to treat and reflect all the relevant uncertainties. The quality measure in this context is the leakage risk, expressed in terms of failure probability and the associated leakage rate, where uncertainties are treated by probability distributions. It is reasonable to question whether the probability distributions provide adequate representations of all the relevant uncertainties. To improve the current risk-based approach, we propose an improved approach that complements the probability distributions by highlighting the uncertainties rather than the probabilities, assesses the risk of deviation from the assumptions and reflects the knowledge-base.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrik Langdalen & Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen & Jon Tømmerås Selvik & Hans Petter Lohne, 2019. "Risk-informed decision-making with an improved risk-based approach to evaluate plug and abandonment designs," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 226-250.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:226-250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=100415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:226-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.