IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v7y2017i3p256-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating the logical-probabilistic modelling with the process phenomenology for an enhanced risk-based decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Micaela Demichela
  • Gabriele Baldissone

Abstract

Usually, the risk-based decision making in process plants is carried on through the quantitative risk assessment traditional techniques. Even if the QRA techniques are consolidated and widely accepted, they are mainly static, hardly taking into account time-dependent events and difficult to be updated in case of plant or process changes. In recent years, some dynamic risk assessment methodologies have been proposed, supported by process simulation, that would also allow to make more accurate balance within the risks and the costs needed to minimise them. This paper shows some applications of the methodology called integrated dynamic decision analysis, highlighting the benefits of integrating the logical-probabilistic modelling and the phenomenological behaviour of a system for the risk-based decision making in process plants. In particular, in this paper, three applications of the techniques to support risk-based decision making are proposed, all of them using economic indicators (different kind of costs) for the technological risk calculation.

Suggested Citation

  • Micaela Demichela & Gabriele Baldissone, 2017. "Integrating the logical-probabilistic modelling with the process phenomenology for an enhanced risk-based decision making," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 256-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:256-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88812
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:256-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.