IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v12y2022i3p208-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The feasibility of implementing the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission enterprise risk management framework in South African small, medium and micro enterprises: a literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Masama
  • Juan-Pierré Bruwer
  • Leon Gwaka

Abstract

Small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs) are capable of rejuvenating economies. Unsurprisingly governments, globally, focus on the promotion of SMMEs. South African SMMEs have high failure rates, attributable by the lack of risk management skills. Formal enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks enhance risk management processes, however South African SMMEs tend to not use any. The COSO ERM framework is a very popular ERM framework; this study aimed to ascertain whether its most recent version is feasible for South African SMMEs to implement. Non-empirical research was conducted as an exploratory literature review, which took on a qualitative research methodology. A total of 405 literature sources were identified and 99 were included and analysed based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the research conducted, it appears that the implementation of the most recent COSO ERM framework is feasible for implementation by South African SMMEs, at least in a theoretical dispensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Masama & Juan-Pierré Bruwer & Leon Gwaka, 2022. "The feasibility of implementing the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission enterprise risk management framework in South African small, medium and micro enterprises: a litera," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 208-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:208-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125288
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:208-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.