IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijassi/v9y2022i4p330-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business intelligent connection between quality and evaluation methods: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Mandellos
  • Dimitris Tsipianitis

Abstract

Nowadays, information and knowledge represent the fundamental wealth of an organisation. Enterprises try to utilise this wealth to gain advantage when making decisions such as a project's acceptance. After a project finishes, a quality management plan defines its quality level. The business intelligence theories help the individual to evaluate the proposed plan in order to target the project's results. But, do all the evaluation methods have the same reliability? We check the project's quality by using paper and online questionnaire administration. Although the scope is the same, there are differences, giving different results. So, we intelligently investigated the quality of the university educational process. The results show that the administration method has a significant effect on overall results. Thus, the quality check of a project using questionnaires needs to have an attentive design, avoid points that introduce uncertainties and able to show the real opinion of the respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Mandellos & Dimitris Tsipianitis, 2022. "Business intelligent connection between quality and evaluation methods: a case study," International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 330-343.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:9:y:2022:i:4:p:330-343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=126768
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijassi:v:9:y:2022:i:4:p:330-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=205 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.