IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijarge/v3y2004i1-2p95-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder perceptions towards agricultural biotechnology in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Aerni

Abstract

National debates on the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology are strongly framed by a country's particular cultural, historical and environmental circumstances, as well as political and economic interests. The following study uses the case of Mexico to investigate stakeholder attitudes in the public debate on agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. For this purpose, a perception survey with 52 stakeholder representatives was conducted in July 2000 in Mexico. The results indicate that the stakeholders in Mexico generally expect agriculture to benefit from agricultural biotechnology and do not believe that the consumption of genetically modified foods will have a serious impact on human health. In turn, they are very concerned about the potential impact of transgenic crops on Mexico's rich biodiversity and are afraid that biosafety guidelines will not be implemented properly. Within the public debate on agricultural biotechnology, academia is regarded as the most important and most trustworthy domestic stakeholder. Its intellectual leadership may be of crucial importance to bring supporters and opponents closer together and elaborate a joint public consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Aerni, 2004. "Stakeholder perceptions towards agricultural biotechnology in Mexico," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1/2), pages 95-115.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:3:y:2004:i:1/2:p:95-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4647
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:3:y:2004:i:1/2:p:95-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.