IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijaape/v9y2013i2p126-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forensic accounting corporations' codes of ethics and standards of practice - a comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Wm. Dennis Huber

Abstract

This is the first study to critically compare the codes of ethics and standards of practice of forensic accounting corporations and whether forensic accountants understand the difference between the codes and standards. This study examines the extent to which forensic accountants are knowledgeable about forensic accounting corporations' codes and standards, and whether they are able to differentiate the differences between them. A survey of 182 forensic accountants found that a significant number of forensic accountants did not investigate the codes and standards prior to receiving their certifications. The results further revealed that a significant number of forensic accountants incorrectly believe that the codes and standards are substantially similar when they are significantly different. This raises questions regarding forensic accountants' investigative ability. It raises further questions concerning forensic accountants' commitment to maintaining high ethical standards and standards of practice. The results suggest a need for reform within the forensic certification industry, for the establishment of an independent agency to monitor and accredit forensic accounting corporations and their certifications, or alternatively for state or federal regulations to enforce minimum standards for forensic accounting corporations and the certifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Wm. Dennis Huber, 2013. "Forensic accounting corporations' codes of ethics and standards of practice - a comparison," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 126-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:126-152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=54340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:126-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.