IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijaape/v6y2010i1p54-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of students' ethics learning experiences to develop ethical reasoning abilities: a comparative study between Japanese and Chinese students

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi Sugahara
  • Naohiro Urasaki
  • Minghai Wei
  • Gregory Boland

Abstract

This study measures the ethical reasoning ability among undergraduate business students from Japan and China for the purpose of assisting the international convergence of accounting ethics education. This study also examined the effect that students' learning experiences had on their overall ethical reasoning abilities. The sample was collected via a questionnaire-based survey administered at four Japanese universities and two Chinese universities in October 2007. A total of 174 undergraduate business students participated from Japan and 174 from China. Rest's defining issues test (DIT) was applied to compute students' ethical reasoning abilities. The results indicate that the average ethical reasoning ability of Chinese students was higher than that of their Japanese counterparts. It was also discovered that ethics learning experiences obtained in secondary schools were useful for both groups of students. It was found that in these two countries, an understanding of the ethical reasoning abilities of undergraduate students is required before a successful international convergence of accounting ethics education programmes can take place.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi Sugahara & Naohiro Urasaki & Minghai Wei & Gregory Boland, 2010. "The effect of students' ethics learning experiences to develop ethical reasoning abilities: a comparative study between Japanese and Chinese students," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 54-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:6:y:2010:i:1:p:54-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30479
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:6:y:2010:i:1:p:54-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.