IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v9y2007i2-3p297-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic growth, 'globalisation' and labour power

Author

Listed:
  • Morris Altman

Abstract

A contentious populist belief maintains that increasing international trade or economic 'globalisation', has deleterious effects upon the economic welfare of the vast majority of the world's population. Such negative effects are an inevitable consequence of capitalism, especially that which embraces globalisation. I argue that this anti-globalisation-trade-market hypothesis is fundamentally flawed. Increasing trade and other attributes of globalisation has the capacity to enhance the bargaining power of labour and thereby economic efficiency and the rate technological change with significant resulting benefits flowing to labour. Tight labour markets can be regarded as a key capability allowing for workers to improve their welfare. But institutions must be in place to allow labour to capitalise on its market generated advantage. Unlike many neoclassical renderings of the globalisation narrative, positive effects of globalisation are in no ways guaranteed and optimised by market forces.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris Altman, 2007. "Economic growth, 'globalisation' and labour power," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2/3), pages 297-318.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:9:y:2007:i:2/3:p:297-318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=13707
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Falguni Pattanaik & Narayan Nayak, 2014. "Economic freedom and economic growth in India: What is the empirical relationship?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 275-298, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:9:y:2007:i:2/3:p:297-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.