IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v6y2012i4p391-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two-phase methodology for modular product customisation

Author

Listed:
  • Hazem J. Smadi
  • Ali K. Kamrani
  • Sa'Ed M. Salhieh

Abstract

Mass customisation is known as producing customised products while entailing the efficiency of mass production. The proposed model is based on manufacturing features and entails the concept of modular design. That is, manufacturing features are identified and analysed in a way that enables the generation of what is called 'manufacturing core'. Manufacturing cores are generated through two phases of optimisation. The first phase is known as product's manufacturing features analysis which includes starting features identification. The second phase is known as manufacturing cores formation that ends with generation of manufacturing cores. A case study is proposed as an implantation of the model on real products (flanges). This approach comes as intermediate production strategy between make to stock and make to order strategies. It provides a decision tool for managers to better identify which strategy is better to use. The model proposes an integrated manufacturing cores and modular design approach. Therefore, lower inventory of sub-assemblies and components are planned for a more efficient production operation. [Received 02 March 2010; Revised 10 November 2010; Accepted 25 January 2011]

Suggested Citation

  • Hazem J. Smadi & Ali K. Kamrani & Sa'Ed M. Salhieh, 2012. "A two-phase methodology for modular product customisation," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 391-421.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:391-421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47663
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:391-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.