IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v2y2008i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishment of semiconductor equipment purchasing evaluation model based on a knowledge management database

Author

Listed:
  • Ching-Chow Yang
  • Bai-Sheng Chen
  • Shu-Yun Peng
  • Tsu-Ming Yeh
  • Lung-Chia Wang

Abstract

The conventional method for selecting a suitable equipment supplier may have disadvantages such as failing to consider the supplier's technical experience and knowledge and inability of supplier management to make further forecast analysis to aid the decision maker in strategy optimisation. The investment in equipment is expensive but is the key success factor in semiconductor manufacturers' maintaining a competitive advantage. Moreover, in order to effectively evaluate the candidate equipment of suppliers, it is critical to include an evaluation of a candidate supplier's historical and test data. This research constructed an explicit knowledge Semiconductor Equipment Evaluation Model (SEEM) primarily to extract tacit supplier knowledge in fulfilling the semiconductor equipment purchase process. SEEM integrates the analytical hierarchy process, grey relational analysis and knowledge management database. The proposed model supplements the conventional method that considers only qualitative criteria or acquisition cost and provides transparency in the purchasing information and process. [Received 31 May 2007; Revised 18 July 2007; Accepted 26 July 2007]

Suggested Citation

  • Ching-Chow Yang & Bai-Sheng Chen & Shu-Yun Peng & Tsu-Ming Yeh & Lung-Chia Wang, 2008. "Establishment of semiconductor equipment purchasing evaluation model based on a knowledge management database," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=16326
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:2:y:2008:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.