IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v17y2023i3p343-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralised or collaborative? Cooperation strategy choice of the supply chain under logistics service integrator empowerment and market size fluctuation

Author

Listed:
  • Weihua Liu
  • Yanjie Liang
  • Xinran Shen

Abstract

Nowadays, the logistics service integrator (LSI) improves service quality by empowering the functional logistics service provider (FLSP). Meanwhile, there are two cooperation strategies: decentralised strategy and collaborative strategy. On this basis, we explore: 1) the cooperation strategy choice of the supply chain members; 2) the impact of the market size fluctuation on their strategy choice. The main findings are as follows. First, when the revenue-sharing coefficient is in the middle range, both the LSI and the FLSP choose the collaborative strategy. Second, when the market size is higher than a certain threshold, no matter what strategy is implemented in the first period, supply chain members are more inclined to choose the decentralised strategy rather than the collaborative strategy in the second period. Third, we find that information asymmetry causes the supply chain members to deviate from optimal decisions, which restrains the collaborative strategy from becoming the equilibrium strategy. [Submitted: 14 May 2021; Accepted: 12 February 2022]

Suggested Citation

  • Weihua Liu & Yanjie Liang & Xinran Shen, 2023. "Decentralised or collaborative? Cooperation strategy choice of the supply chain under logistics service integrator empowerment and market size fluctuation," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 343-378.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:17:y:2023:i:3:p:343-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=130607
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:17:y:2023:i:3:p:343-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.