IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v14y2020i5p684-714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient generalised opposition-based multi-objective optimisation method for factory cranes with time-space constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Binghai Zhou
  • Xiumei Liao

Abstract

In order to improve the performance of large manufacturing enterprises, besides the adoption of new technologies, it is also feasible to efficiently schedule logistics equipment such as cranes, which costs much less since only software changes are involved. In this research, the objectives of minimising total waiting cost and total delay cost are optimised simultaneously when executing crane-delivery tasks in factories. Given the time-space constraints and NP-hard nature of the problem, a generalised opposition-based learning (GOBL) mechanism and two problem-based searching strategies are developed and fused into the multi-objective differential evolution approach, namely GOMODE. The introduction of GOBL mechanism enables the proposed algorithm to search in a more extensive solution space, which improves the population diversity and avoids the premature problem. The performance of the GOMODE has been compared with classical multi-objective optimisation algorithms. The experimental results indicate that the GOMODE achieves a better performance both on solutions' quality and diversity. [Received: 11 December 2018; Accepted: 23 December 2019]

Suggested Citation

  • Binghai Zhou & Xiumei Liao, 2020. "An efficient generalised opposition-based multi-objective optimisation method for factory cranes with time-space constraints," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(5), pages 684-714.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:14:y:2020:i:5:p:684-714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=109923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:14:y:2020:i:5:p:684-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.