IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/amerfa/v4y2015i2p151-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal hedging strategy with futures oil markets via FIEGARCH copula model

Author

Listed:
  • Dhoifli Ifa
  • Ahmed Ghorbel

Abstract

In this work, our aim is to evaluate the hedging strategies performance of a range of traditional methods such as one-to-one, MCO, and other methods based on GARCH models and copula theory, for two spot and futures energy markets: WTI crude oil and heating oil. We model dependence structure between spot and futures oil markets using copula theory that applied to bivariate standardised residuals data obtained from two fitted univariate FIEGARCH models. This procedure permits to simultaneously capture asymmetric non-linear behaviour, dependence structure, and long memory. We use this method with different copulas functions (Joe, Frank, bb1, Gumbel, Gaussian and dynamic) to investigate hedging performance and the efficiency of copula methods in risk reduction and return improvement. The empirical results show that the combination of the FIEGARCH model and Joe copula is the best hedging strategy for both indices, because it gives the (H/E) ratio the lowest. Also the results show that the dynamic copula does not improve the results found by other strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhoifli Ifa & Ahmed Ghorbel, 2015. "Optimal hedging strategy with futures oil markets via FIEGARCH copula model," American Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 151-171.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:151-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=72596
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:151-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=229 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.