IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/amerfa/v3y2013i1p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative performance of Islamic and conventional banks in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad M. Abu-Alkheil
  • Hans-Peter Burghof
  • Walayet A. Khan

Abstract

We employ data envelopment analysis (DEA) to examine the relative efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in the UK and Switzerland during 2008-2009, accounting ratio analysis to measure the financial performance of the European Islamic Investment Bank (EIIB) during 2005-2008, and a matched-pairs t-test to determine the differences in the EIIB performance in the pre-versus post financial crisis periods, respectively. Results suggest that the Islamic banks in Europe experience lower cost efficiency, higher allocative inefficiency and poor, but relatively better, technical efficiency compared to conventional banks. The inefficiency of the banks is mostly due to their sub-optimal size of operations. Findings further show that the EIIB exhibits a clear paradox between its high operating efficiency and low profitability. EIIB gradually became illiquid but still remains solvent. A comparison of the bank's performance in the periods before and after the crisis does not show statistically significant differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad M. Abu-Alkheil & Hans-Peter Burghof & Walayet A. Khan, 2013. "Comparative performance of Islamic and conventional banks in Europe," American Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:1-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=57167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aziz Kutlar & Ali Kabasakal & Mehmet Sena Ekici, 2017. "Efficiency of commercial banks in Turkey and their comparison: application of DEA with Tobit analysis," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 84-103.
    2. Maysa’a Munir Milhem & Rasha M. S. Istaiteyeh, 2015. "Financial Performance Of Islamic And Conventional Banks: Evidence From Jordan," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(3), pages 27-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=229 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.