An empirical analysis of auditors' evidence gathering techniques in Bahrain
AbstractThis study investigates auditors' perceptions regarding audit evidence gathering techniques in the following areas: extent of use, reliability, average time spent and persuasiveness of the collected evidence. Additionally, the problems encountered by the auditors in using these techniques in the field are also catalogued. This study used a survey method and collected information from the Big 4 and non-Big 4 firms in Bahrain. The results indicate that the auditors primarily use documentation, analytical procedures and confirmations in collecting evidence. The auditors rank confirmation, physical and documentary evidence as the most reliable forms of evidence. The auditors also spend most of their time on these techniques. However, the sufficiency and competency of the audit evidence is rated as merely satisfactory. The Bahrain business environment is conservative and secretive, which affects the audit process and partly explains our results. The common problems faced by both the Big 4 and non-Big 4 firms are difficulties in collecting external evidence and uncooperative clients. The study also analyses the differences in the perceptions of the Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors and experienced versus non-experienced auditors. The results of this study shed light on the problems and perception of the auditors in the non-Western countries in using standard evidence collection techniques.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Afro-Asian J. of Finance and Accounting.
Volume (Year): 1 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214
audit evidence; Bahrain; Big 4 firms; non-Big 4 firms; evidence persuasiveness; auditor perceptions; auditing; reliability; evidence collection.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Mohamed Zakari & Karim Menacere, 2012. "The challenges of the quality of audit evidence in Libya," African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 3-24.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.