Liberalisation and the value relevance of accrual accounting information: evidence from the Johannesburg securities exchange
AbstractUsing panel data from 118 firms across a time period of 17 years and a battery of tests, this paper examines two research questions that pertain to the expected gains stemming from corporate information liberalisation through the adoption of international accounting (financial reporting) standards. Results indicated that accrual accounting data at aggregate (market-wide) level did not show break point(s) around the time of critical corporate information liberalisation years. At the microlevel, panel data tests on a version of Ohlson's (1995) model showed poor fits, but initially indicated some improvement (adjusted R-squares of between 12% and 25%) in value relevance in the post-information liberalisation period. However, when scale issues were addressed in cross-sectional level-type panel regressions, the difference in the R-squares vanished; suggesting that the value relevance of accounting information did not improve in the post-liberalisation period.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Afro-Asian J. of Finance and Accounting.
Volume (Year): 1 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214
value relevance; information liberalisation; disclosure; IAS; IFRS; South Africa; international accounting standards; international financial reporting standards; Johannesburg securities exchange; corporate information.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.