IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v10y2020i4p494-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should Indonesia adopt a basket currency regime?

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Danu Prasetyo
  • Camelia Magdalena
  • Brian Charvia
  • Mandra Lazuardi Kitri

Abstract

Exchange rate regime is a system in which a country manages its currency about other currencies and the foreign exchange market. Currently, there are two major types of exchange rate regimes, i.e., free-float system and pegged system. Many countries, including Indonesia, adopted the free-float system since it is believed as the best regime for absorbing external economic shocks. However, some economists argued that a moderate exchange rate regime, such as currency basket system, is a better approach for achieving the government's goals. The research aims to provide an arrangement for optimal basket weights of Indonesian currency basket to minimise GDP volatility as well as exchange rate volatility. We develop an optimisation model in the extension of Yoshino et al. (2017) by adding five currencies in the basket. We found that the weight currencies in the free-float regime would reflect the trade intensities of the respective countries. Further, the government should monitor the change of exchange rates of currencies in the foreign reserves and change the weight accordingly. In addition, we also found that, whether the government implementing basket currency regime or free-float regime, it will make no significant differential effect on GDP gap volatility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Danu Prasetyo & Camelia Magdalena & Brian Charvia & Mandra Lazuardi Kitri, 2020. "Should Indonesia adopt a basket currency regime?," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 494-513.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:494-513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=110490
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:494-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.