IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjpf/v09y2011i1p54-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct Tax Reforms in India: A Comparative Study of Pre- and Post-Liberalization Periods

Author

Listed:
  • Om Parkash
  • A S Sidhu

Abstract

In a developing economy like India, tax occupies a strategically important position in the overall development of the country due to its significant contribution to the national exchequer, which is ultimately spent on the overall development of different sectors of the economy. The budget for 1991-92 indicated a major effort toward correcting the fiscal imbalances and increasing the tax revenue through increase in the direct taxes. The study analyzes the impact of direct tax reforms on Indian economy in terms of various economic indicators and compares it with the pre-reform period. The study reveals that tax reforms introduced during the post-liberalization period could not generate the results as desired. The reduction in direct tax rates could not lead to better tax compliance in a much desired manner. Tax reforms have increased the number of assessees but the resultant increase in the tax revenue has not been sufficient. The major share of taxes comes from low income groups. This ineffectiveness will widen the gap between rich and poor and will lead to further inequality in the society. The rising arrears of taxes have further put a question mark on the efficiency and effectiveness of the tax collecting machinery. The widening fiscal deficit over the period will reduce investments in social sectors, like education and health. Therefore, there is again a very strong need to review the tax reform policies being followed in the post-liberalization period.

Suggested Citation

  • Om Parkash & A S Sidhu, 2011. "Direct Tax Reforms in India: A Comparative Study of Pre- and Post-Liberalization Periods," The IUP Journal of Public Finance, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 54-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjpf:v:09:y:2011:i:1:p:54-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjpf:v:09:y:2011:i:1:p:54-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.